Colemak-DH vs Workman

A data-driven comparison measured on the same English text, with no opinions dressed up as facts.

Colemak-DH
Q
W
F
P
B
J
L
U
Y
;
A
R
S
T
G
M
N
E
I
O
Z
X
C
D
V
K
H
,
.
/
69%of keystrokes on the home row
1.1%same-finger letter pairs
57%letter pairs that alternate hands
0.39key widths of travel per keystroke
Workman
Q
D
R
W
B
J
F
U
P
;
A
S
H
T
G
Y
N
E
O
I
Z
X
M
C
V
K
L
,
.
/
66%of keystrokes on the home row
3.0%same-finger letter pairs
55%letter pairs that alternate hands
0.41key widths of travel per keystroke
Quick answer

On everyday English text, Colemak-DH puts 69% of keystrokes on the home row and Workman puts 66%. Same-finger pairs: Colemak-DH 1.1%, Workman 3.0%. Colemak-DH wins 6 of 8 measures.

Head-to-head numbers

MeasureColemak-DHWorkmanBetter
Home row use69.0%66.3%Colemak-DH
Hand alternation57.4%54.5%Colemak-DH
Same-finger bigrams1.11%3.01%Colemak-DH
Avg finger travel (key widths)0.3860.410Colemak-DH
Pinky load15.8%14.9%Workman
Top row use17.3%21.7%Colemak-DH
Bottom row use13.7%12.0%Workman
Left hand share49.1%51.4%Colemak-DH

Measured by Typeri on 6,782 words (31,571 letters) of original everyday English text from our passage library, using a standard row-staggered keyboard and conventional finger assignments. Travel is the average straight-line distance, in key widths, from each finger's home key to the key it presses. Same-finger bigrams count pairs of different letters typed consecutively by the same finger inside a word.

Learning cost from QWERTY

Colemak-DHWorkman
Letters moved from QWERTY1920
Z, X, C, V kept in placeZ, X, CZ, X

Fewer moved letters usually means a faster switch. Keeping Z, X, C and V in place matters more than it sounds, because undo, cut, copy and paste are among the most used shortcuts on any computer.

Finger load

FingerColemak-DHWorkman
Left pinky8.5%8.5%
Left ring8.8%10.9%
Left middle12.0%13.6%
Left index19.8%18.4%
Right index19.0%16.6%
Right middle15.9%15.9%
Right ring8.7%9.7%
Right pinky7.4%6.4%

Which should you choose?

Choose Colemak-DH if you want fewer awkward same-finger motions; you rely on Ctrl+Z, X, C and V shortcuts; you want a shorter learning curve from QWERTY.

Choose Workman if you are already comfortable on it and want to keep your current speed.

What the numbers do not tell you

These figures measure effort, not speed. Plenty of people type over 100 WPM on QWERTY, and the biggest typing study to date found that technique, not layout, separates fast typists from slow ones. Treat a layout change as a comfort and long-term investment, and expect several weeks of slower typing while you switch.

Try both on your own text

Paste your own emails or essays into the Layout Lab to see how Colemak-DH and Workman handle the words you actually type. Then read the full guides to Colemak-DH and Workman.

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Is Colemak-DH or Workman faster?

Neither layout is automatically faster. Colemak-DH scores better on more effort measures here, but your speed depends mostly on practice and technique. Most people who switch take weeks to months to recover their old speed.

Which has more home row typing, Colemak-DH or Workman?

Colemak-DH: 69.0% of keystrokes versus 66.3% on everyday English text.

How were these numbers measured?

Measured by Typeri on 6,782 words (31,571 letters) of original everyday English text from our passage library, using a standard row-staggered keyboard and conventional finger assignments. Travel is the average straight-line distance, in key widths, from each finger's home key to the key it presses. Same-finger bigrams count pairs of different letters typed consecutively by the same finger inside a word.

Cite or share this dataFree to reuse with a link back. Copy a citation:Typeri. (2026). Colemak-DH vs Workman keyboard layout comparison. Retrieved from https://typeri.com/keyboard-layouts/compare/colemak-dh-vs-workman/<a href="https://typeri.com/keyboard-layouts/compare/colemak-dh-vs-workman/">Colemak-DH vs Workman keyboard layout comparison</a> (data: Typeri)